Backup, replication, immutability, and disaster recovery frameworks that protect operational continuity. Patch governance and recovery validation are treated as preventative cybersecurity controls — not afterthoughts.
A backup that’s never been restored is not a backup — it’s a hope.
We design data protection as an engineered discipline, not a procurement line item. Every framework we build starts with the recovery objective: how fast, how much data, how clean, and under what adversary conditions. Those answers drive the architecture — not the platform brochure.
Ransomware has changed what “data protection” means. Immutability, air-gapped recovery, segmented restoration, and validated RTO/RPO aren’t best practices anymore. They’re the minimum standard. We design to that standard — and we validate against it before we sign off on go-live.
Patch governance and recovery testing sit inside the data protection practice, not outside it. If we can’t recover it, we haven’t protected it.
Workload-aligned backup topology, replication strategy, and retention policy. Designed around the actual recovery objective, not a vendor template.
Ransomware-resilient immutable snapshots, air-gapped vaults, and segmented recovery infrastructure. The backup adversaries can’t touch.
Multi-site DR topology, failover orchestration, and recovery site integration. Designed against real business continuity targets.
Measured recovery objectives — validated through structured testing, not assumed from platform specifications.
Lifecycle management of firmware, patches, and platform versions. Preventative cybersecurity built into the protection layer.
Forensic-grade recovery workflow, clean-room restoration, and incident-response integration. Tested against realistic attack scenarios.
Data protection isn’t a tape library. It’s architecture that assumes compromise and survives it — immutable snapshots, tested recovery, validated RTOs, and controls that hold when the ransom note lands.
Recovery objectives modeled. Adversary conditions mapped. Topology designed before the platform is chosen.
Platforms procured against the design — Commvault, Veeam, NetApp, and the broader ecosystem. Vendor follows architecture.
Structured rollout with full recovery validation. Every backup tested. Every restore timed. Go-live confirmed, not assumed.
Recurring recovery tests. Patch governance. Firmware lifecycle. Protection stays current — and stays validated.
Our data protection practice is built on platforms that take recovery seriously. Commvault anchors our enterprise data-protection work — cyber-resilience across on-prem, cloud, and SaaS. NetApp provides native immutability and integrated snapshots at the storage layer. Veeam rounds out the portfolio across broader mid-market workloads.
The platform follows the architecture — we don’t lead with a vendor.
Explore our partner ecosystem →A 30-minute consultation with a senior practitioner. We’ll walk through the recovery objectives, the gaps, and where we’d start the engineering.
Schedule an Assessment